Mister Harrys
  • Home
  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Best MCM group on Facebook

Living

Living

Kitchens

Kitchens

Television

Television

Cars

Cars

Motels

Motels

Shopping

Shopping

Space

Space

Atom

Atom

 



Three elements color, materials and accessories – can take a kitchen out of the workaday class and into the realm of leisure living. When Dr. and Mrs. Goddard Du Bois remodeled a kitchen, porch, pantry and closets into one big room for cooking, family activities and informal parties, they chose a sophisticated color scheme of blue, white and black. It is carried out in two versions. In the kitchen emphasis is on white and black: white for the ceiling, countertops and the wood cabinets above the counter, black for those below. Blue curtains and blue glass are the color accents. Beyond the cooking island, the scheme is reversed. The ceiling is painted blue, bench and banquette are upholstered in blue plastic, the curtains are blue-and-white. Black dining chairs, white globe-shaped lighting fixtures, white-topped table are the accents. Warmth and bright color come from mahogany paneling, a copy of modern painting, a garden view. A black-spattered white vinyl floor links the two areas.




–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
source: House and Garden Magazine | August 1959

 


Surprising and sudden as it always seems, small children grow into big ones. Unexpectedly the house is hopping with their teen-age projects, parties and friends along with the activities of their enthusiastic if less lively parents. These are the flourishing years of family life, the years that can be the best, as well as the busiest if the house works equally well for both generations. If it doesn't, it may seem as if bedlam were built in.

Key to the success of this house  is that it gives a fair share of independence and privacy to both parents and children. Mr. and Mrs. S. M. Solton have a daughter Jamie, 16 and a son Steve, 18. For their Beverly Hills home they firmly stipulated a playroom and patio for the teenagers, a bed-sitting room and terrace for themselves. The family shares the major rooms, of course, as it shares most interests and activities, and also has fun around the landscaped pool, and outdoor areas. But when the young people want to rock 'n roll and play Ricky Nelson they have their own territory to do it in and they can charge in and out of the playroom without disturbing their parents. Each generation also has complete individual privacy in the well secluded bedrooms. The Soltons say the plan works perfectly. They want their children to enjoy dancing and swimming parties at home and to be able to have overnight and week-end guests. And they entertain a great deal themselves. In this happy household both generations can enjoy these pleasures painlessly.













–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
source: House and Garden Magazine | June 1959

 


The sun-bathed courtyard is the fresh- air core of the suburban Chicago house that Mr. and Mrs. Harold Levin built on the premise that a house and all its pleasures belong to the children as well as to the parents. The living room, the dining room and the entrance hall all open to the court, and so does the big glass-walled playroom shared by Michael, 11; Debbie, 8; and Ellyn, 4. All year round parents and children together enjoy the visual delights of the court's sun and shadows, its planting of trees and flowers and its placid pool. In spring the children watch the birds return to the birches; in summer they love to dangle their feet in the pool. And for fully seven months of the year, Mr. and Mrs. Levin can use the court for their own leisure hours and for entertaining.










–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
source: House and Garden Magazine | April 1959

 


Neither the Anthony Reinachs nor their architects had a courtyard plan in mind when they first discussed the design of this house. The idea evolved as the Reinachs outlined "what kind of people they were" in voluminous notes to the architects and numerous conversations. And as interest grew in "a sheltered but sunny outdoor living area" a center court became the key to the design. It embodied many ideas they cherished. They "loved stone, wood, greenery" and the court introduced an excellent place for these materials. Their concept of beauty was a house with "warmth and a feeling of wholeness" and the court is indeed an inviting magnet which unites all elements of the house in a cheerful way.

It presents many other advantages. It relates the major rooms to each other practically, lets them be joined together for summertime parties. For entertaining, Mrs. Reinach says, "the house is flexible enough for any kind of party we've been able to dream up." Yet the court is a useful buffer area that definitely separates the living and children's rooms in a way few conventional one-story plans can equal. And it contributes many intangible, agreeable effects. One is the balance of light and the changing patterns of light which occur in rooms where daylight comes from two sides. Another is the elimination of any long, dark corridors. And especially desirable is the visual enlargement of the living and dining rooms, the study and the entrance hall. The dimensions of each of these rooms seem to be extended by the courtyard.


As you walk into the entrance hall, you get a full view of the courtyard and its planting. In spring, bulbs and a fruit tree bloom here. In winter, it may be cloaked, picturesquely, in snow. The living and dining rooms beyond form one great area effectively divided by a free-standing storage cabinet. But only a glass wall separates them from the court which provides a dramatic outlook and sky- high spaciousness. At the same time, the court clearly divides the whole living area and guest room-study from the kitchen and children's rooms-almost as if they were separate houses. Beyond the kitchen, the Reinach children, Barron, 4, and Alan. 2. have their own bedrooms adjacent to the playroom at one corner of the house; it opens to the south terrace. Storage facilities throughout the house are remarkably generous and well engineered. Cupboards, closets and cabinets representing one-third of the total floor area were carefully planned to keep everything readily available near the point of use.








AN INNER SANCTUM where the Reinachs can enjoy the outdoors in total privacy, the courtyard is linked by one sliding door to the living and dining rooms in back and by another to the study at left. (The illusion of a glass-roof interior is actually a reflection of the court in the upper glass of living room.) Behind solid wall at right is the kitchen, well lighted by ribbon windows under the roof. Because the courtyard is a sheltered "sun trap," Mr. and Mrs. Reinach can use it more than half the year, even in the Westchester County climate. They enjoy it in winter too. After they moved in and the first snow fell they were so entranced by the effect they sat up most of the night watching the white carpeted court and the fantastic shapes assumed by the shrubbery.


Like any woman who enjoys cooking, Mrs. Reinach had a host of ideas about how the kitchen in her courtyard house should work. Her very successful partnership with the architects produced a kitchen-breakfast area that is handsome but not opulent, efficient but not stark. Visually, the length is minimized by the two arms of the U-shaped working center, one of which contains a double sink, the other, a cooking counter. Above the burners is suspended an exhaust hood finished in soft blue, which assumes the clean form of a piece of contemporary sculpture. Storage facilities are abundant and beautifully paneled in walnut. Opposite the work center, there is a storage wall 21' long with two built-in refrigerators and ovens. Just off the kitchen is the children's playroom which has a barbecue fireplace, vinyl tile flooring and plastic-coated walls tough enough to withstand chalk and crayon scrawls.



–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
source: House and Garden Magazine | April 1959

 I was born into a world that was already ending. The final days of the Cold War weren’t something I read about in textbooks — they were the background noise of my earliest memories. Romania in the late 80s and early 90s felt like waking up in a house that had burnt down overnight: walls still warm, smoke hanging in the air, people wandering through rubble trying to understand what had happened.

There’s something strange about entering life during a revolution. On the one hand, everything felt possible; on the other, everything felt dangerous. The Revolution, the Mineriade, the chaos on the streets — these weren’t historical events for us. They were simply the environment. I remember adults talking in hushed voices, neighbors sharing rumors, the news full of violence and uncertainty. When you grow up inside a collapse, it shapes you. You learn early that stability is an illusion, and that the world can shift under your feet at any moment.

The funniest part is that we didn’t even realize how dramatic it all was. Kids are adaptable, and my generation learned to dance in the firelight. We played outside while adults worried about inflation, hunger, and politics. But that tension soaked into us. It became part of our inner wiring — that mixture of alertness, cynicism, and dark humor that people mistake for pessimism. In reality, it’s just the survival instinct of a child raised in a world that had stopped making sense.



Because when you grow up in the ruins of something big — an empire, a dictatorship, an ideology — you inherit not just the rubble, but also the ghosts.

Right after the revolution The U.S. military and US christian groups moved in bringing all kind of aid. Not tanks rolling through the streets, not a dramatic landing—just soldiers in uniforms quietly taking over an abandoned orphanage that was near that old commie blocked where i was born. To me, as a child, it felt unreal. The orphanage had always symbolized Romania’s broken past, and suddenly it was filled with voices, energy, and an order we had never seen. It was like the world outside our borders had finally stepped directly into our neighborhood.

Those soldiers didn’t come with speeches or politics. They came with boxes. Mountains of boxes. Inside them were clothes that actually kept out the cold, toys that didn’t fall apart if you breathed on them, sweets that tasted like nothing we’d ever known, and food that came in packaging so futuristic it looked like props from an American action movie. Families lined up around the courtyard, and the soldiers—smiling, patient, and impossibly tall to a kid my age—handed everything out with a kindness that felt strange, almost too soft for the world we lived in. My first proper winter coat came from them. So did my first chocolate bar that didn’t crumble like chalk.

They didn’t just drop things off and leave. They stayed. They talked to people. They played with us kids after handing out supplies. They helped families repair walls, fix roofs, mend broken windows—things that had been neglected for years. For a community still stumbling out of the shadows of dictatorship and poverty, their presence felt like sunlight hitting a room that had been closed for decades. People would always say with tears in their eyes, “They didn’t have to do this.” But they did it anyway. The Americans finally arrived to save us as our grand parents told us they would. And that shaped us in ways no politician or textbook ever could.

When I think back on it now, the symbolism feels almost too poetic to be real. The abandoned orphanage, a symbol of our national trauma, became the place where we first encountered warmth, generosity, and a totally different kind of power—not the power of force, but the power of help. For a Romanian kid born on the ruins of an old world, that was the first glimpse of what America really meant. It wasn’t movies or speeches or flags. It was a soldier kneeling down to hand you a toy, a coat, a chocolate bar, or simply a smile. And without realizing it, that moment planted something in my generation: trust, gratitude, and a quiet but unshakeable connection to America that endures to this day.

We grew up in a country where the old world had collapsed overnight but the new one hadn’t arrived yet. Europe looked at Romania like a problem it didn’t know how to solve, and for a long time it simply didn’t bother. There was no unified European message, no cultural lifeline coming from Paris or Berlin. Instead, a strange silence hovered over everything. And into that silence, the United States stepped—not with official visits, but with Canon Films explosions, Saturday morning cartoons, English-speaking actors on VHS tapes, and reruns of American TV shows that came to us exactly as they were: in English, without dubbing, without filters, without reinterpretation. American media arrived raw and unaltered—and that alone changed the fate of an entire generation.

Canon Films especially became the mythology of our childhood. For a Romanian kid in the early ’90s, Chuck Norris, Sylvester Stallone, and Michael Dudikoff were not just actors—they were moral clarity. In a world where adults were confused, afraid, or still adjusting to capitalism, the Canon heroes taught us the oldest American lesson: there are good guys, bad guys, and standing up for what’s right is worth it. We watched these films in English, often with no subtitles, renting VHS tapes that had been copied twenty times, the image flickering and the sound distorted, but still perfect. Through these movies, we understood one thing with absolute certainty: when things go bad, the Americans show up. That belief, naïve or not, became the bedrock of our worldview.

But Canon Films were only the beginning. American TV invaded our living rooms with the same generosity the U.S. military had shown when they helped us after ’89. We ate Kellogg’s Frosties—a luxury at the time—while watching the exact same English-language cartoons American kids were watching. Fox Kids and Cartoon Network didn’t just broadcast shows; they broadcast the United States directly into our brains. There was no Romanian dub, no reinterpretation; we learned English by absorbing it. Shows like Eerie Indiana, Goosebumps, Are You Afraid of the Dark, Sliders, Josh Kirby, and reruns of I Dream of Jeannie, Bewitched, and Leave It to Beaver weren’t just entertainment—they were English classes, cultural lessons, and windows into a world far more colorful than ours. Even wrestling—during the height of Hulkamania—came to us raw, with Hogan shouting into the camera about prayers and vitamins, and we understood him, somehow, without needing translations.

And then there was Dallas—the mother of all cultural invasions. Every Romanian family watched it, gathering around the TV like it was a national holiday. It was in English, of course, and even when we didn’t understand every word, we understood everything. The confidence. The wealth. The drama. The freedom. The sheer audacity of American life. Dallas didn’t just entertain Romania; it rewired us. It taught our parents ambition and taught us kids that there was a bigger, brighter world out there. Larry Hagman even once said that he was more famous in Romania than in some US states. And so, while Western Europe slowly transitioned into the MTV era, we jumped from the rubble of a fallen dictatorship straight into American pop culture in one leap. No other European country had such a rapid, overwhelming Americanization.

When people today ask why Romanians speak English so naturally, why we “get” American humor, why we feel closer to the U.S. than many Western Europeans do, the answer isn’t political. It’s personal. It’s nostalgic. It’s embedded in our childhoods. We are the generation raised on undubbed American TV, rented VHS tapes, cereal commercials, wrestling chants, and the belief—absorbed from every show and film—that America was the good guy who eventually shows up. We weren’t just influenced by the United States.
In many ways, we were raised by it.

And when I think about it, I realize we were not alone in this experience. Yakov Smirnoff, who grew up on the other side of the Iron Curtain, went through something very similar. He arrived in America with the same awe, the same hunger for possibility, and through his humor and work became not just an entertainer, but a true American patriot—proof that even those raised in the shadows of the Cold War could absorb the ideals of this country, celebrate them, and carry them forward with pride.


And the funny part? The Reagan-era glow wasn’t something we consciously adopted. It just slipped into us through every VHS tape, every rerun, every wrestling match that flickered across that old TV screen. It was the America of confidence, of clear roles, of moral certainty—things that our own country couldn’t provide while it was busy learning how to be free again. For a Romanian kid in the 90s, that kind of clarity was intoxicating.


What truly defines my generation is the way we hold history in our minds. We didn’t live through the dictatorship consciously, but we grew up in the ruins of its psychology. We understood the old people perfectly, even though we were meant to be “new.” We knew the dark humor, the cynical reflexes, we understand and laugh at Radio Yerevan jokes, the quiet paranoia, the unspoken rules. We absorbed them without wanting to, the same way kids absorb second-hand smoke.

But at the same time, we were also the first generation who could talk back. Not disrespectfully—just fluently. We could debate politics, identity, history with people in their 70s as if we had lived their lives ourselves. The strange part is that we never questioned why. It just felt natural, as if the trauma of the past had been whispered to us through walls, through half-sentences, through the tone adults used when discussing “serious things.” We were raised on inherited memories.

Younger generations don’t have that. They grew up too normal, too digital, too disconnected from the texture of the 90s—those cold stairwells, those smoky kitchens, those tense political debates on TV where everyone looked like they hadn’t slept in 20 years. To them, history is interesting. To us, it feels recent. That’s the difference. They barely understand or even care about what happened 30+ years ago.

Sometimes I think we behave like a generation that lived through a war we can’t remember. We carry the instincts, the reflexes, the humor, the exhaustion, but not the origin story. It’s like being told all your life, “We fight the enemy. That’s what our people do.” But nobody remembers the first blow. Nobody remembers who started it. And yet the vigilance remains—even when the threat is gone.

Maybe that’s why we were always half-tired by the time we turned 25. We were born with a backlog.

We are a generation that grew up at the intersection of history’s chaos and pop culture’s promise. I remember the fall of the USSR not just as a headline in the paper, but as a tectonic shift that seemed to ripple through every corner of life. Romania, already struggling to find its footing, suddenly felt like it was being swept along in a current too strong to resist. Schools, neighborhoods, and families were all learning the same lesson: the old certainties were gone, and no one was entirely sure what would replace them. For us kids, the collapse wasn’t abstract. We could see factories closing, parents fretting about jobs, streets changing names overnight. And then there was the story of the King Michael of Romania attempting to return home after years in exile. The still-communist government initially refused him entry, but eventually, he managed to come back, and his return became a symbol of hope for the country. I remember hearing about the celebrations, seing them on TV—over a million people flooding the streets, waving flags, singing, cheering. It felt like Romania could finally reclaim its dignity and pride, and for a child growing up in that chaos, it was one of the first signs that even in a broken world, good things could still happen.

The 1990s in Romania were also marked by sudden shocks, both political and violent. There were the Mineriade, when miners, under vague orders and fueled by anger, stormed Bucharest streets and government buildings. Entire communities watched, tense and fearful, as chaos unfolded in what was supposed to be the dawn of freedom. Then came the war in Yugoslavia, spilling close to home, reminding us that borders could be fragile and neighbors could become enemies overnight. Even as Romania tried to rebuild itself, we were forced to reckon with the fragility of peace, the unpredictability of politics, and the lingering shadows of history. These events made the world feel simultaneously larger and smaller—larger because global events could touch our lives directly, smaller because we realized no one was truly in control, not even the adults we trusted.

The 2000s arrived, and with them, a new kind of rapid-fire reality. 9/11 shook the globe, creating a wave of fear and hypervigilance that reached all corners of the world, including ours. There are kids that were born that day, that now have kids of their own…and for them this is ancient history, but for us is still an open wound…like Alan Jackson said “Where were you when the world stopped turnin'That September day?”…The war in Iraq reminded us that even distant conflicts could reshape global politics and the collective mood at home. 23 romanian soldiers died and hundreds were wounded in the Middle East while fighting alongside the US troops. Fighting under that beautiful american flag…like the heroes of our Canon movies. 

On a cultural plane, the death of Michael Jackson hit Romania deeply. Seeing Michael Jackson perform live in Bucharest years earlier had been a near-magical experience for many of us—a proof that, after decades of isolation, Romania could finally share in global pop culture. That concert wasn’t just entertainment; it was a milestone, a shared national moment of wonder and joy. When he passed, it felt personal. We had grown up with his music, his style, his presence as a sign that Romania could belong to the same world the Americans, the Europeans, and the MTV generation already inhabited.

And then the personal and political collided again and again. The attempted assassination of President Trump reminded us that even the most powerful people were not untouchable. A Kennedy back in the White House felt like history echoing itself, connecting us to events we had only studied in textbooks or old newsreels. Each new event arrived like a punch—one after another, faster than our minds could catch up. Our generation never experienced a slow-paced, digestible history. We absorbed revolutions, wars, political upheavals, pop culture phenomena, and celebrity deaths all at once. The rhythm of life was relentless, leaving us simultaneously alert, fatigued, and occasionally cynical. We learned quickly that the world can change in an instant, that stability is fragile, and that good things sometimes come unexpectedly, like the return of a king or a once-in-a-lifetime concert in our city.

Living through this torrent of events forged a unique kind of resilience—and also a heavy kind of psychological fatigue. We became experts in pattern recognition, able to see how history repeats itself and how old grudges echo through modern conflicts. We also learned to laugh, often darkly, as a coping mechanism, because humor was the only way to survive the constant acceleration of events we could neither control nor fully understand. By the time our peers in other countries were entering adulthood, we had already witnessed more upheavals than most people do in a lifetime. We are the last generation to feel the echoes of the Cold War in our bones while also being the first to grow up fully immersed in a global media-saturated culture. VHS tapes, Fox Kids, Dallas, Hulkamania, and real-world historical shocks all collided in our childhoods, shaping a generation that is both historically fluent and psychologically resilient—a liminal bridge between a world that ended and a world that was still being born.

I’ve always believed, in the way Reagan spoke of America, that it is a “shining city on a hill,” a beacon of hope for the world. That light wasn’t just propaganda—it was real, tangible, and it reached Romania in ways that no textbooks or official visits ever could. After decades of dictatorship and the disorientation of the early 1990s, Romania looked to that light for guidance. We watched, we listened, and we followed. The values, the optimism, the practical solutions to impossible problems—they didn’t just stay on the television screen. They became part of how we imagined our future. The America we saw was confident, principled, and willing to act, and we absorbed that example eagerly, knowing we needed a model for the country we wanted to become.

And we did follow. Over the decades, the presence of the United States in Romania grew in ways both subtle and spectacular. American companies opened offices and factories, shaping our economy and introducing global standards. American media, streaming, news, and pop culture, became part of daily life, teaching us English fluently and organically, like we had done as children with VHS tapes and Saturday morning cartoons. American military advisors and bases showed up, training alongside our forces, helping professionalize our army, and embedding a culture of discipline and readiness. We learned the value of interoperability, strategy, and alliance, and our commitment to Washington sometimes put us at odds with Brussels—but we understood instinctively why it mattered.

Even in the most practical ways, the American influence reshaped Romania. English became common in official documents, in military manuals, in medical protocols. The creation of SMURD, our emergency medical system, was heavily shaped by American experience and technology. The use of Medical Blackhawks, a unique feature in Europe, showed that we were willing to adopt not just methods, but entire ways of thinking about mobility, efficiency, and rapid response. Our car culture even changed: massive pickup trucks—a typically American statement of freedom and capability—now roll down Romanian highways, just as symbols of aspiration and alignment with the practical, hands-on spirit we admire.

And it’s not only the functional. Look around and you see statues of American presidents, revivals of diplomatic and cultural relations that echo the 1930s, when Romania and the U.S. first built bonds of friendship and mutual respect. Today, those bonds are alive, tangible, and celebrated. I see them not as abstract symbols, but as markers of a historical arc completed: from cautious recognition, through Cold War suspicion, into partnership, admiration, and shared values. And in my heart, the pinnacle of that journey was seeing the Romanian flag at Arlington—standing proudly among the stars and stripes. For me, for my generation, it was more than a ceremony. It was proof that our country had not only survived the tumult of history, but had chosen, consciously and proudly, to align with the beacon of hope that first inspired us as children.

I am more than happy, more than honored, to witness this. The Romania I grew up in—the Romania of rubble, VHS tapes, Saturday morning cartoons, U.S. soldiers in abandoned orphanages—is gone. In its place stands a country that learned from the best, embraced opportunity, and built bridges across oceans and generations. And as I look around today, I can finally say: the shining city on the hill wasn’t just a dream for America—it became a lighthouse for Romania, guiding us through the darkness, into a world full of possibility, partnership, and pride.

GOD BLESS THE USA!

 


It is teen-age time that tests the mettle of a house most severely. Children are individualists now and their acquisitions, activities, the space they need for entertaining a dozen friends plus their new need on occasion for absolute privacy strain a house to the seams. At the same time their parents are at the most gregarious period of their lives and ask much more of their homes than in earlier years. Each generation has different views on work and play, noise and quiet, order and disorder. What must a house have to meet such demands?

The answer architect Burton Romberger found for his own home and family was flexibility. He planned his house at Newport Beach, Cal., with a suite for his wife and himself at the back, his daughters' rooms and study, at the front. In between are a living-dining room and two patios which can be used so elastically that parents' and children's activities can overlap, be separated or joined. Kathie, 16, and Anne, 19, can have their own crowd in the study playing records and buzzing over matters of moment while their parents, at the other end of the house, remain undisturbed. The girls can concentrate on homework in their bedrooms while Mr. and Mrs. Romberger use the rest of the house for a grown- up party. Or both generations can entertain at the same time. They can have buffet dinners, movies, hi fi, or danc- ing in patios and living room without disrupting card games and conversation in the study. In this house, neither generation "takes over."

The girls' separate bedrooms (each is 1912' x 13') and bathrooms give both of them complete privacy and a chance to try their wings at decoration. Kathie's, with yellow walls, turquoise rug and a blue-green bedspread, has a tailored look. Anne's is blue, pink and frilly. Their cabinets and closets are generous, for the girls have collected records, dolls, shells, flowers, stamps and, not surprisingly, they have a considerable interest in clothes. (Also dramatics, singing, painting, swimming, crafts and long telephone conversations.) Each room is big enough to accommodate a guest overnight (a convenience likely to be much in demand in any teen-age household).

Mr. and Mrs. Romberger's own bedroom doubles as a sitting room. It is ideally located to give them comfortable seclusion when Anne and Kathie are giving parties and conveniently opens wide to the south court. Clothing storage is confined to the two big, adjoining dress- ing rooms with lavatories. There is also plenty of storage for knitting and sewing supplies and countertops for cutting fabrics since Mrs. Romberger does a good deal of dressmaking for her daughters and herself.

Television too is sensibly located in this room. It is built in, as is the entire system of sight and sound equipment which is Mr. Romberger's special interest. In the living room he has installed a hi-fi and organ system that has seven speakers, chimes, and is also connected with a sound movie projector located in a sound-proof closet off the bedroom hall. The projector window is hidden by a movable picture on the wall and the screen pulls down behind the dining room buffet.

All these details, joined as they are to a flexible plan, contribute to a smooth running household during the years when family interests are most diverse.





–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
source: House and Garden Magazine | March 1959

Older Posts Home

Best MCM group on Facebook

Best MCM group on Facebook

Join our vintage kitchens group

Join our vintage kitchens group

Subscribe on youtube for a lot of cool things are coming!

ABOUT ME

Viewers choice!

  • For this 1958 house, the patio doubles space! Plan provided
  • A compact home for a family of 4. Plans included!
  • An outstanding MCM home from november 1959. Plans provided
  • All-America Homes 1959 - plan #125
  • Burger-pizza recipe from 1959

Designed by OddThemes | Distributed by Blogspot